Publication
title
In a rush to obtain your U.S. patent?-The USPTO proposes a two-tiered system for examining patent applicationsIn a rush to obtain your U.S. patent?-The USPTO proposes a two-tiered system for examining patent applications
DATE
December 4, 2006
EXPERTISE
The waiting time to obtain a patent from the American patent office (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO) is getting longer and longer, especially in the information technology, telecommunications and business methods sectors. On August 25, 2006, the USPTO proposed new rules to accelerate examination and allow patents to be issued in less than twelve (12) months.
THE TWENTY-YEAR TREND: A GROWING BACKLOG
The statistics for the last twenty years show that the gap between the number of patent applications filed and the number of patents issued has been widening steadily (see Fig. 1 below).
FIG. 1
(reproduced with the permission of the IPO)
For example, in 2005 the number of patent applications filed with the USPTO increased by 8%, while the number of patents issued decreased by 11%. This obviously means that the USPTO examiners' workload is increasing consistently, as is the time elapsed between the filing of a patent application and the first official letter from the USPTO. The table below shows the number of months elapsed before the first official letter is sent, depending on the technology centre.
|
Technology centre |
Description of technology | Months before first office action |
| 2810 | Static memory and digital logic |
20 |
| 2890 | Semiconductor, Electrical, Optical Systems and Components |
20 |
| 2870/2880 | Liquid crystals, optical elements, optical systems, fiber optics, lasers, electric lamps, registers, optics measuring and radiant energy |
20 |
| 2820 | Semiconductors and electrical circuits |
20 |
| 3660 | Computerized vehicle controls and navigation, radio wave optical and acoustic wave communication |
22 |
| 2850/2860 | Photocopying, recorders, measuring and testing, printing |
22 |
| 2830/2840 | Power generation and distribution, music, electrical components and control circuits |
23 |
| 3710 | Amusement and education devices |
26 |
| 2680 | Radio Telecommunications |
26 |
| 2180 | Computer architecture |
29 |
| 2670 | Computer graphics |
31 |
| 2110 | Computer architecture |
31 |
| 2650 | Dynamic information storage and retrieval |
31 |
| 2120 | Miscellaneous computer applications |
33 |
| 2630 | Digital, optical, and general communications |
33 |
| 2610 | Television |
34 |
| 2640 | Audio, speech processing and wired telephone |
36 |
| 2160/2170 | Graphical user interface, data bases |
36 |
| 2620 | Image analysis |
37 |
| 2130 | Cryptography, security |
39 |
| 2190 | Interprocess Communications and Software Development |
40 |
| 2140/2150 | Computer networks |
42 |
| 2660 | Multiplex communication |
47 |
| 3620 | Electronic Commerce |
48 |
Table 1 - Source: http://www.uspto.gov/ as at October 31, 2006.
WHAT YOU CAN DO
One of the means advocated by the USPTO to reduce pendency comprises revising the rules in order to accelerate examination. The new rules came into force on August 25, 2006. The goal of these rules is to provide a final decision on whether or not an invention is patentable, that is, a notice of allowance or a final rejection, within twelve (12) months. The highlights of the new accelerated examination procedure are as follows:- A petition must be filed together with a US$130 fee.
- The application must be complete (include the fees, declaration, etc.) and filed electronically with the USPTO.
- The application must contain three (3) or fewer independent claims and twenty (20) or fewer total claims.
- The claims must be directed to a single invention.
- The applicant must agree to participate in an interview with the examiner to discuss the patentability of the invention.
- The applicant must provide the results of a pre-examination search and a detailed explanation of how the proposed claims are patentable over each of the relevant references.
It is important to note that currently pending patent applications may be refiled electronically as a continuation application so as to take advantage of the accelerated examination procedure. It is also important to be aware that all statements concerning the patentability of your invention may be used to construe your patent claims.
THE DECISION IS YOURS
If your invention falls under one of the sectors listed above and you would like to obtain a patent quickly, for example, because the technology in your sector changes quickly, you may want to consider the new accelerated examination procedure. Even though the initial cost is slightly higher because you have to prepare additional documentation, the additional costs will be compensated by the fact that you will obtain your patent anywhere from one to four years faster than under the normal procedure.Marc Benoît
The purpose of this document is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of Ogilvy Renault LLP or any member of the firm on the points of law discussed.
© Ogilvy Renault LLP 2006 - All Rights Reserved
Contacts
Marc S. Benoît
Montréal
514.847.6049
msbenoit@ogilvyrenault.com
Profile
Alexandra Daoud
Montréal
514.847.4333
adaoud@ogilvyrenault.com
Profile
Isabelle Chabot
Québec
418.640.5174
ichabot@ogilvyrenault.com
Profile
Kent Daniels
Ottawa
613.780.8673
kdaniels@ogilvyrenault.com
Profile








